www.vExperienced.co.uk

If you’re in the market to take a VMware certification exam, there’s some good news – provided you’re quick. For the next couple of days (while VMworld Barcelona is running, Oct 9th-11th 2012) you can book the VCP and VCAP exams at a cool 50% off. For VCP that’s a saving of approx £50 and more like £200 for the VCAP exams! If you want to blitz some of the new certification tracks recently announced you’re not limited to just one – study your little legs off and you could save even more by taking multiple exams….

The codes you need to register with are;

• VMWBAR50 – for the VCP exams (VCP-DV, VCP-DT,VCP-Cloud etc)
• ADVBAR50 – for the VCAP exams (VCAP-DCA, VCAP-DCD etc)

Conditions:

• You MUST book the exam while VMworld Barcelona is running. You don’t have to be attending the conference, it’s just the period of time the offer is valid.
• You MUST take the exam by the end of the year.

What are you waiting for? Head over to VMware Certification and get registered certification junkies!

I’ve been running a home lab for a few years now and recently I decided it needed a bit of an upgrade. I’ve been looking at the growing trend towards online lab environments but for the time being I made the decision that it’s still cost effective to maintain my own. I need to learn the latest VMware technologies (which requires lab time) and partly because the geek in me wants some new toys.

Storage was the first thing I needed to address. While I’ve got an Iomega IX2-200 (the two disk version) it’s not really usable as shared storage for a lab due to slow performance (about 17MB/s for read, 13MB/s for writes). If I were a patient man that would be fine for testing but I found myself putting VMs on local disks so I could work quicker which rather defeats the purpose of a lab for HA/DRS etc. I’ve built a home NexentaStor CE server which is feature rich (ZFS, snapshots, dedupe, tiered SSD caching) but I’ve found the configuration and maintenance less than simple and it’s a big, heavy old server (circa 2007) which won’t last much longer. My wishlist included the following;

• Easy to use – I want to spend my time using it, not configuring and supporting it
• Small form factor, minimised power consumption
• Hypervisor friendly – I’d like to play with VMware, Citrix, and Microsoft’s Hyper-V
• Cloud backup options. I use Dropbox, SugarSync and others and it’d be useful to have built in replication ability.
• Hook up a USB printer
• Flexibility to run other tasks – bit torrent, audio/movie streaming, webcams for security etc (which my Iomega also offers)
• VLAN and aggregated NIC support (both supported by my lab switch, a Cisco SLM2008)
• Tiered storage/caching (NOT provided by the consumer Synology devices)

My requirements are by no means unique and there were three devices on my shortlist;

• Iomega’s Storcenter px4-300d only held four disks and performance wasn’t quite as good as the Synology
• QNAP’s 569 Pro II – almost identical feature wise but slightly more expensive
• Synology’s Diskstation 1512+. Note: when first released there were some issues with this device but they’ve been addressed by Synology so you can order with confidence.

I choose Synology for a couple of reasons, primarily because I’ve heard lots of good things about the company from other bloggers (Jason Nash comes to mind) and Synology have a wide range of devices to choose from at different price/performance points. They’re not the cheapest but many people say the software is the best around and having been bitten once with the IX2-200 I figured I’d go upmarket this time. The model I choose was the relatively new DiskStation 1512+, a five bay unit which satisfies most of my requirements with the exception of tiered storage. I was excited when I first read a while ago that some of the Synology units fully support VAAI but not so this particular model according to Synology (the DS412+ has only limited support). I guess it’s always possible that support will find its way into lower end models such as the 1512+ (even if unsupported) at a future date – here’s hoping!

UPDATE Sept 14th 2012 – While both NFS and iSCSI work with vSphere5.0 the 1512+ is only certified by VMware for iSCSI on vSphere 4.1 as of 14th Sept 2012. Previous devices (the 1511+ for example) are listed for both NFS and iSCSI, also with vSphere 4.1. Rather than being incompatible it’s more likely that they just haven’t been tested yet although there are problems with both NFS and iSCSI when using vSphere5.1 and DSM 4.1.

UPDATE Oct 3rd 2012 – Synology have released an update for their DSM software which fixes the compatibility issues with vSphere 5.1 although it’s referred to as ‘improved performance’ in the release notes. I’ve not tested this yet but hopefully it’s all systems go. Good work Synology!

There are some additional features I wasn’t looking for but which will come in useful for a home lab;

• Syslog server (especially useful with ESXi nowadays)
• DHCP server
• CloudStation – ‘Dropbox’ style functionality

Having chosen the unit I then needed to choose the drives to populate it with as the unit doesn’t ship with any. My lab already includes some older disks which I could have reused plus I had two SSDs in the NexentaStor server which I considered cannibalising. After reading this excellent blogpost about choosing disks for NAS devices (and consulting the Synology compatibility list) I went with five WD Red 2TB HDDs as a compromise between space, performance, compatibility, and cost. I missed the introduction of the ‘Red’ range of hard disks that’s targeted at NAS devices and running 24×7 but they get good reviews. This decision means I can keep all three storage devices (Iomega IX2, Nexenta and Synology) online and mess around with advanced features like StorageDRS.

UPDATE Feb 18th 2013 – Tom’s hardware had a look at these WD Red drives and they don’t seem great at high IOps. I’ve not done much benchmarking but maybe worth investigating other options if performance is key.

I bought my Synology from UK based ServersPlus who offered me a great price and free next day shipping too. I was already on their mailing list having come across them on Simon Seagrave’s Techhead.co.uk site – they offer a variety of bundles specifically aimed at VMware home labs (in particular the ML110 G7 bundles are on my wish list and they do a cheaper HP Microserver bundle too) and are worth checking out.

Using the Synology 1512+

Following the setup guide was trivial and I had the NAS up and running on the network in under ten minutes. I formatted my disks using the default Synology Hybrid RAID which offers more flexibility for adding disks and mixing disk types and only has a minimal performance impact. Recent DSM software (v4.0 onwards) has been improved so that the initial format is quick and the longer sector check (which takes many hours) is done in the background, allowing you to start using it much faster.. My first impression was seeing the management software, DSM, which is fantastic! I’m not going to repeat what others have already covered so if you want to know more about the unit and how it performs here’s a great, indepth review.

I enabled the syslog server and was quickly able to get my ESXi hosts logging to it. Time Machine for my MBP took another minute to configure and I’m looking forward to experimenting with CloudStation which offers ‘Dropbox like functionality’ on the Synology.

Chris Wahl’s done some investigation into iSCSI vs NFS performance (although on the Synology DS411 rather than the 1512+) and I found similar results – throughput via iSCSI was roughly half that of NFS. I wondered if I had to enable multiple iSCSI sessions as per this article but doing so didn’t make any difference. All tests were over GB NICs and the Synology has both NICs bonded (2GB LACP);

• Copying files from my MBP (mixed sizes, 300GB) to the Synology – 50MB/s write
• Creating a file (using dd in a VM, CentOS 5.4) via an NFS datastore – 40MB/s write
• Creating a file (using dd in a VM, CentOS 5.4) via an iSCSI datastore – 20MB/s write
• Creating a thick eager zeroed VMDK on an iSCSI datastore – 75MB/s write

Given Synology’s published figures which claim a possible write speed of 194MB/s these were rather disappointing but they’re initial impressions NOT scientific tests (I also tried a similar methodology to Chris using IO Analyser which also gave me some odd results – average latency over 300ms!) so I’ll update this post once I’ve ironed out the gremlins in my lab.

Tip: make sure you disable the default ‘HDD hibernation’ under the Power settings otherwise you’ll find your lab becoming unresponsive when left for periods of time. VMs don’t like their storage to disappear just because they haven’t used it in a while!

LAST MINUTE UPDATE! Just before I published this post the latest release of DSM, v4.1, was finally made available. DSM 4.1 brings several enhancements and having applied it I can attest that it’s an improvement over an already impressive software suite. Of particular interest to home labs will be the addition of an NTP server, a much improved Resource Monitor which includes IOPS, and an improved mail relay.

Overall I’m really impressed with the Synology unit. It’s been running smoothly for a couple of weeks and the software is definitely a strong point. It’s got a great set of features, good performance, is scalable and might even include VAAI support in the future.

Further Reading

A performance comparison of NAS devices (fantastic site)

Indepth review of the Synology 1512+ (SmallNetBuilder.com)

What a week! My son was born on Sunday and on Friday night I finally received notification that I passed the VCAP5-DCA beta exam I sat back in May. Good things come to those that wait!

I really thought I’d failed as I didn’t even attempt four or five questions and I know I missed a few bits on the ones I did answer. It’s a great relief to have it out of the way however – with vSphere6 slated for a 2013 release it means I’ve got around two years grace before I have to consider upgrading again (assuming it takes a year for the exam to become available like last time!). It’s worth noting that 37% of the visitors to my blog (who responded to my poll on the right) don’t think the VCAP exams add any value over and above the VCP so maybe I’m just ‘keeping up with the Joneses’ for the sake of vanity!

Next up for me is VCAP5-DCD, VCP-IaaS, and VCP-DT, probably in that order. It’s like a cereal pack competition where you have to collect them all…

IT is a fast moving industry, and the current shift to cloud computing is accelerating the rate of change. With the forthcoming release of the vSphere5 VCAP exams (VCAP5-DCA and the VCAP5-DCD) I’ve been planning to study my socks off to get both exams under my belt. I’m sure I’m not alone in struggling to make study time, particularly as my day job doesn’t tend to cover all of the material either because we’re only Enterprise level licensing or because we don’t use all the features. On top of that I’d like to update my VCAP-DCA study guide which will consume a significant chunk of time.

This serious case of study contention has made me revisit my priorities. The VMware ecosystem has evolved considerably over the last few years and there’s considerable buzz around VMware View and vCloud Director (not to mention the whole Cloud Foundry and vFabric ecosystem). Maybe these would be better areas to focus on? As John Troyer said about certifications “You don’t have to collect them all!” but it does make me wonder – which VMware certs are most likely to benefit career progression?

VCP or VCAP?

First some facts. The VMware platform which evolved into vSphere was launched in 2001, the first VCP exam was available in June 2003 (@susangude is VCP#1), and the first VCAP exams were launched seven years later in August 2010. Nine years on and the statistics are well known – around 60,000 VCPs worldwide and approximately 600 certified in each of the two VCAP tracks (so 50 VCPs for every VCAP!).

Read more…

Like many I’m hoping to take the new advanced VMware certification VCAP-DCA later this year. This is my first post in my VCAP-DCA study notes series and covers section 8.3, Administer vSphere with the vMA. The notes are mainly intended as a revision list rather than a tutorial so you should have some knowledge of the topic before starting (there are links at the bottom to help you get started if not). Most of this content has been covered elsewhere previously so kudos to those who spent time discovering it – I’ve simply collected it all together for reference.

I’ve covered the topics on the VCAP-DCA blueprint and included some detail on the new vSphere 4.1 features as you never know when they’ll get included in the exam. The only exceptions are esxcli and vmkfstools which I’ll cover as part of section 1 (managing storage) and section 6 (troubleshooting).

Main uses

• syslog server (vilogger component)
• centralised scripting repository
• replacement for ESX service console (scripts and third party plugins)
  • easier to port service console scripts rather than converting to PowerCLI
  • scripts may need amending (new authentication methods etc)
  • facilitates move to ESXi

Prerequisites, installation and updating

Prerequisites

• ESX host must support 64-bit VMs (Intel EM64T and vT technology)
• ESX 3.5U2 onwards, vCentre 4.0 onwards (2.5 NOT supported)
• 512MB, 1vCPU, 5GB+ disk space

Read more…